Observed data
Figures copied from a source table, API, or official dataset after cleaning. These are cited directly and should be reproducible from the listed source.
Methodology
Artometrics reports are built for two readers at once: a curious beginner who needs a clear path through the chart, and a domain expert who wants to know where the evidence came from. The chart headline is the first claim. The references, limitations, and editor notes are the audit trail.
The site uses public datasets, official APIs, agency documentation, and published literature where available. Some reports are direct data analysis. Others are framework reports that use editorial indices to make a comparison possible. When a score is interpretive, the report should say so plainly.
Figures copied from a source table, API, or official dataset after cleaning. These are cited directly and should be reproducible from the listed source.
Ratios, ranks, medians, concentrations, and indexes calculated from observed data. The report should explain the calculation in plain language.
Framework scores used to compare identity, strength, weakness, or cultural position when no single public statistic exists. These are not official measures and must be labeled as interpretation.
Peer-reviewed papers, agency documentation, official data dictionaries, and credible reference publications that help interpret what the data can and cannot prove.
Examples
Source library
These are recurring sources and literature anchors used to frame Artometrics reports. Individual reports still carry their own references; this page is the shared map.
Sources used for broad, fast-moving public-data reports.
Reference sources for fame, film, music, literature, and cultural production.
Official data portals for trade, regional economics, cities, and policy systems.
Reference databases used for team identity, dynasty, and league comparison reports.
Agency sources used when reports depend on official program definitions.