Skip to content
Culture desk

UK MUSEUMS: The Artometrics of UK Museums

This report analyzes the TidyTuesday 2022-11-22 release on UK Museums — 4,191 rows after cleaning and merge.

Artometrics Editorial5 min read
Share this article
UK MUSEUMS: The Artometrics of UK Museums
This report analyzes the TidyTuesday 2022-11-22 release on UK Museums — 4,191 rows after cleaning and merge.

This report analyzes the TidyTuesday 2022-11-22 release on UK Museums4,191 rows after cleaning and merge. Which UK museums sit in which deprivation bands — and how are they distributed?

Five charts track Area Deprivation index across time, category, and named entities — trend, leaders, distribution, tiers, and relationships. Where companion files exist in the repo, they are joined before analysis so reception, geography, or metadata columns are not left on the table.

FAST FACTS

4,191Records in the working dataset
5.00Median Area Deprivation index
10.0Highest observed Area Deprivation index
Blenheim PalaceTop Name of museum by Area Deprivation index
/England/South West (EnglishMost common Admin area

DATASET CONTEXT

The source is the TidyTuesday release from 2022-11-22 (R for Data Science community). This working file contains 4,191 rows and 35 columns after merging all available CSV/XLSX tables in the week folder.

Charts are exported as Plotly JSON with PNG fallbacks. Medians are used for robustness where distributions skew. Index-style fields (row numbers, sequential IDs) are excluded from metric selection.

How to read this report: start with the chart caption, then ask what the metric actually means, what a non-expert should notice first, and what an expert would challenge in the source. The goal is not to memorize every number; it is to leave with a sharper question than the one you arrived with.

Reader path: if you are new to the topic, treat each chart as a guided tour of one question: who leads, how concentrated the field is, what changes over time, and where the outliers sit. If you already know the domain, use the same charts as a challenge: check whether the metric is the right proxy, whether the source omits an important population, and whether the headline survives the limitations section.

CHART 1 — BREAKDOWN

Area Deprivation index by Name of museum

The Archaeology Centre leads at 10.0; Smithy Heritage Centre anchors the low end at 10.0.

Grouping by name of museum exposes how the metric varies across the catalog's major entities.

CHART 2 — LEADERS

Top Name of museum

The Archaeology Centre leads at 10.010.0 marks the median among the top dozen.

Head-of-field concentration is where quality, scale, or brand visibly separates from the pack.

CHART 3 — DISTRIBUTION

Area Deprivation index by Admin area

Category boxes reveal whether area deprivation index consensus is shared or contested across tiers.

Wide whiskers flag segments where outliers — not averages — drive reputation.

CHART 4 — GAP ANALYSIS

Area Deprivation index vs median by Admin area

/England/South West (English Region)/Wiltshire (English UA) sits 2.00 above the median; /England/South West (English Region)/Cornwall (English UA) trails by 1.00.

Diverging from the median exposes which tiers over- or under-perform — not just who ranks first.

SUPPLEMENT — RELATIONSHIP

Area Deprivation index vs DOMUS identifier

Joint plot of area deprivation index and domus identifier surfaces clusters the averages erase.

Bubble size tracks repeat presence — outliers are archetypes, not noise.

LIMITATIONS

Community-cleaned TidyTuesday snapshots are not live APIs. Missing values, spelling variants, and week-of-export coverage limits apply. Merged tables may fan out or duplicate rows when join keys are imperfect.

Findings describe the file on hand — treat them as structural signals about UK Museums, not exhaustive truth about the full domain.

CONCLUSION

Read as a teaching map, UK Museums shows why one metric is rarely enough: leaders, tails, trends, and relationships each answer a different question about area deprivation index.

The best reading is modest: use the chart to sharpen the question, then check the source and limits before turning it into a claim.

REFERENCES

Data Science Learning Community. (2022). TidyTuesday: UK Museums. https://raw.githubusercontent.com/rfordatascience/tidytuesday/main/data/2022/2022-11-22/museums.csv

EDITOR'S NOTE

Artometrics data report from the TidyTuesday research pipeline. Charts and aggregates are reproducible from the embedded exhibits and public source files.

View TidyTuesday source on GitHub